Data & analysis
Systematic and scoping reviews
A systematic review is a method, not a longer literature review. It stands or falls on whether another researcher could repeat your search and arrive at the same included studies.
Suited to
- Health, nursing and medical dissertations requiring PRISMA reporting
- Evidence-based practice modules and portfolios
- Scoping reviews mapping an emerging field
- Management and social science reviews using structured methods
01In practice
How this actually works
We build the review from a protocol: research question in PICO, PEO or an equivalent framework, databases, search strings per database, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the screening process, all fixed before screening begins.
Screening is documented at every stage so the PRISMA flow diagram reports real numbers — records identified, duplicates removed, titles and abstracts screened, full texts assessed, studies included, with reasons for exclusion.
Quality appraisal uses the instrument appropriate to your field, and synthesis is narrative or meta-analytic depending on whether the included studies are homogeneous enough to pool.
02Scope
What is delivered
Written down so there is nothing to discover later.
You receive
- A written protocol with question framework and eligibility criteria
- Full search strategy reproduced for each database searched
- Screening log with exclusion reasons at full-text stage
- A PRISMA flow diagram populated with your actual figures
- Data extraction table across included studies
- Quality or risk-of-bias appraisal using a recognised instrument
- Narrative synthesis, or meta-analysis with forest plots where pooling is justified
Not included
- We do not report a review as systematic when the search was not systematic
- We do not pool studies that are too heterogeneous to pool
03Process
From brief to delivery
Protocol
Question, frameworks, databases and criteria agreed and written down before any screening happens.
Search and deduplication
Searches run per database with the strings recorded, then deduplicated with counts retained for PRISMA.
Screening and appraisal
Title and abstract screening, then full-text assessment against criteria, with quality appraisal of included studies.
Extraction and synthesis
Structured extraction into a comparison table, then narrative synthesis or meta-analysis as the evidence allows.
04Questions
About systematic reviews
More general questions about how we work are answered on the FAQ page.
What is the difference between a systematic and a scoping review?
Do you carry out meta-analysis?
How long does a systematic review take?
05Related
Often needed alongside this
Literature reviews
A synthesised argument built from sources you can retrieve and defend, not a summary list.
Journal publication
Journal targeting, manuscript preparation and reviewer responses that address the review.
Get a quote for systematic reviews
Send the assessment criteria and your department’s guidance with the brief. Those decide the shape of the work more than the topic does. We reply within a few hours on working days.
What to have ready
- The assessment criteria or handbook
- Your deadline and word count
- Anything already written or approved
Not sure which service you need? Describe the project and we will tell you — including when the cheaper one is enough.
